25.10(B) [1995 Revision] Verdict Directing-Negligently Supplying Dangerous Instrumentality for Supplier's Business Purposes

Instruction No 1 25.10(B) [1995 Revision] Verdict Directing--Negligently Dangerous Instrumentality for Supplier's Business Purposes Your verdict must be for plaintiff if you believe: First, defendant supplied (here describe instrumentality supplied, such as automobile, hair dye, etc.) for use, and Second, the (describe instrumentality ) (here describe defect or hazard such as "had a wheel constructed, with improperly tempered steel that had a propensity to break"; "included an ingredient that would cause systemic damage in certain persons", etc.) and was therefore dangerous when put to a reasonably expected use, and Third, the (describe instrumentality ) was put to a reasonably expected use, and Fourth, defendant knew or in the exercise of ordinary care could have known of such dangerous condition, and Fifth, defendant failed to exercise ordinary care to [either] [make the condition reasonably safe] [or adequately warn of it], and Sixth, as a direct result of such failure, plaintiff sustained damage. * [unless you believe plaintiff is not entitled to recover by reason of Instruction Number (here insert number affirmative defense instruction ) ]. Supplying