Last updated:
74.220 Undue Influence; Inadequacy of Consideration; Fraud as Indicated by
Start Your Free Trial $ 13.99What you get:
- Instant access to fillable Microsoft Word or PDF forms.
- Minimize the risk of using outdated forms and eliminate rejected fillings.
- Largest forms database in the USA with more than 80,000 federal, state and agency forms.
- Download, edit, auto-fill multiple forms at once in MS Word using our Forms Workflow Ribbon
- Trusted by 1,000s of Attorneys and Legal Professionals
Description
74.220 Undue Influence; Inadequacy of Consideration; Fraud as Indicated by Where an issue is made of fraud in the procurement of a contract, you may consider inadequacy of consideration, with other facts in the case, in determining that issue. Faulkner v. Faulkner, 84 Ga. 73(2) (1889) (Note: Although the above may be accurate on the issue of fraud, it is not quoted in Faulkner. An instruction that follows recent authority is as follows: Inadequacy of price alone is not sufficient to set aside a conveyance unless the inadequate price, taken in connection with other circumstances of a suspicious nature, raises such a vehement presumption of fraud that you, the jury, find it sufficient to set aside the conveyance.) Durrence v. Durrence, 267 Ga. 280 (1996) Lasater v. Petty, 220 Ga. 592 (1965); "vehement" is used consistently in these cases





