600.05. Issues-Apportionment of Responsibility-Separate or Third Party Complaint Tried and Submitted Consecutively to Same Jury

600.05 Issues--Apportionment of Responsibility--Separate or Third Party Complaint Tried and Submitted Consecutively to Same Jury [1] You have found that [_____________] [is] [are] liable to [_____________]. You must now decide [_________________]'s claim that he is entitled to contribution from [______________] for a percentage of the damages awarded to [______________]. [2] [_________________] claims that negligent in one or more of the following respects: [_________________] was also [Set forth in simple form, without undue emphasis or repetition, those allegations of the third party complaint as to the conduct of the third-party defendant which have not been withdrawn or ruled out by the court and which are supported by the evidence.] [_________________] further claims that one or more of the foregoing was a proximate cause of [_________________]'s [injuries] [and] [damages]. [3] [_________________] [denies that he did any of the things claimed by [_________________];] [denies that he was negligent [in doing any of the things claimed by [_________________]];] [and denies that any claimed act or omission on the part of [_________________] was a proximate cause of [_________________]'s [injuries] [and] [damages]]. [4] [[_________________] also asserts the following affirmative defense[s]: [Set forth in simple form, without undue emphasis or repetition, those affirmative defenses in the third-party answer which have not been withdrawn or ruled out by the court and which are supported by the evidence.]] [5] [[_________________] denies [that] [those] affirmative defense[s].]