3071. Retaliation For Refusing Disclosure of Medical Information Essential Factual Elements | Pdf Doc Docx | Jury Instructions

 California Jury Instructions   30 Civil Rights 
3071. Retaliation For Refusing Disclosure of Medical Information Essential Factual Elements | Pdf Doc Docx | Jury Instructions

Last updated: 5/27/2022

3071. Retaliation For Refusing Disclosure of Medical Information Essential Factual Elements

Start Your Free Trial $ 13.99
200 Ratings
What you get:
  • Instant access to fillable Microsoft Word or PDF forms.
  • Minimize the risk of using outdated forms and eliminate rejected fillings.
  • Largest forms database in the USA with more than 80,000 federal, state and agency forms.
  • Download, edit, auto-fill multiple forms at once in MS Word using our Forms Workflow Ribbon
  • Trusted by 1,000s of Attorneys and Legal Professionals

Description

3071. Retaliation for Refusing to Authorize Disclosure of Medical InformationEssential Factual Elements (Civ. Code, § 56.20(b)) Instruction No 1 Request by Plaintiff Given as Proposed Refused Withdrawn Request by Defendant Given as Modified Requested by Given on Court's Motion Judge Instruction No 1 [Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] discriminated against [him/her] because [he/she] refused to authorize disclosure of [his/her] of medical information to [name of defendant]. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following: 1. That [name of defendant] asked [name of plaintiff] to sign an authorization so that [name of defendant] could obtain medical information about [name of plaintiff] from [his/her] health care providers; That [name of plaintiff] refused to sign the authorization; That [name of defendant] [specify retaliatory acts, e.g., terminated plaintiff's employment]; That [name of plaintiff]'s refusal to sign the authorization was a substantial motivating reason for [name of defendant]'s decision to [e.g., terminate plaintiff's employment]; That [name of plaintiff] was harmed; and That [name of defendant]'s conduct was a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]'s harm. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Even if [name of plaintiff] proves all of the above, [name of defendant]'s conduct was not unlawful if [name of defendant] proves that the lack of the medical information made it necessary to [e.g., terminate plaintiff's employment]. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ New June 2015

Related forms

Our Products