California > Judicial Council > Juvenile
Six-Month Prepermanency Attachment Reunification Services Continued JV-432 - California
| Six-Month Prepermanency Attachment Reunification Services Continued Form. This is a California form and can be used in Juvenile Judicial Council . |
|
||||||
 Get this form for FREE as a print-only pdf |
|||||||
|
JV-432 CHILD'S NAME: CASE NUMBER: SIX-MONTH PREPERMANENCY ATTACHMENT: REUNIFICATION SERVICES CONTINUED (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21(e)) 1. By a preponderance of the evidence, the return of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child. The factual basis for this conclusion is stated on the record. Placement 2. The child's out-of-home placement is necessary. 3. 4. The child's current placement is appropriate. The child's current placement is not appropriate. The county agency must locate an appropriate placement for the child. a. The matter is continued to the date and time indicated in form JV-430, item 25 for a written oral report by the county agency on the progress made in locating an appropriate placement. b. Other (specify): 5. The child is placed outside the state of California and that out-of-state placement a. b. continues to be the most appropriate placement for the child and is in the best interest of the child. does not continue to be the most appropriate placement for the child and is not in the best interest of the child. The matter is continued to the date and time indicated in form JV-430, item 25 for a written oral report by the county agency on the progress made toward (1) (2) (3) returning the child to California and locating an appropriate placement within California. locating an out-of-state placement that is the most appropriate placement for the child and in the best interest of the child. Other (specify): Reunification services 6. For child under the age of three years at time of initial removal or a member of a sibling group a. Having considered the relevant evidence, including the following factors (1) Whether there has been significant progress in resolving the problems that led to the removal; (2) (3) Whether the capacity and ability to complete the objectives of the treatment plan and to provide for the child's safety, protection, physical and emotional health, and special needs has been demonstrated Whether there has been consistent and regular contact and visitation with the child. The court finds there is a substantial probability that the child may be returned to the mother biological father Indian custodian presumed father legal guardian other (specify): within six months of the date of this hearing or within 12 months of the date the child entered foster care, whichever is sooner. b. Reasonable services have not been provided to the biological father mother presumed father legal guardian Indian custodian other (specify): Page 1 of 2 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California JV- 432 [Rev. July 1, 2011] SIX-MONTH PREPERMANENCY ATTACHMENT: REUNIFICATION SERVICES CONTINUED (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21(e)) Welfare and Institutions Code, § 366.21(e); Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.708 and 5.710 www.courts.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com JV-432 CHILD'S NAME: CASE NUMBER: 7. Reunification services are continued for the mother presumed father a. b. biological father legal guardian Indian custodian other (specify): as previously ordered. as modified (1) on the record. (2) in the case plan. The likely date by which the child may be returned to and safely maintained in the home or placed for adoption, tribal customary adoption, legal guardianship, or in an identified placement with a specific goal is (specify date): 8. Important individuals 9. Child 10 years of age or older, placed in a group home for six months or longer from the date the child entered foster care a. The county agency has made efforts to identify individuals who are important to the child and to maintain the child's relationship with those individuals, consistent with the child's best interest. b. The county agency has not made efforts to identify individuals who are important to the child and to maintain the child's relationship with those individuals, consistent with the child's best interest. c. To identify individuals who are important to the child and to maintain the child's relationships with those individuals, the county agency must provide the services (1) stated on the record. (2) specified here: Health 10. The mother presumed father biological father legal guardian Indian custodian other (specify): is unable unwilling unavailable to make decisions regarding the child's needs for medical, surgical, dental, or other remedial care, and the right to make these decisions is suspended under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 369 and vested with the county agency. Advisement 11. The court informed all parties present at the time of the hearing and further advises all parties that if the child is not returned to the home at the permanency hearing set on a date within 12 months from the date the child entered foster care, the case may be referred to a selection and implementation hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26 that may result in the termination of parental rights and adoption of the child and other members of the sibling group or, in the case of an Indian child for whom tribal customary adoption under section 366.24 is selected as the permanent plan, modification of parental rights and the adoption of the child and other members of the sibling group. Twelve-month permanency hearing date: JV-432 [Rev. July 1, 2011] SIX-MONTH PREPERMANENCY ATTACHMENT: REUNIFICATION SERVICES CONTINUED (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21(e)) Page 2 of 2
|
|||||||
