Idaho > Federal > District Court
Scheduling Conference Form-Litigation Plan-Alternate Dispute Resolution Options (Judge Williams) - Idaho
| Scheduling Conference Form-Litigation Plan-Alternate Dispute Resolution Options (Judge Williams) Form. This is a Idaho form and can be used in District Court Federal . |
|
||||||
 Get this form for FREE as a print-only pdf |
|||||||
|
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FORM LITIGATION PLAN/ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION OPTIONS This form may assist you in submitting a proposed scheduling time-frame for your case. Plaintiffs counsel shouldcontact all parties and discuss the Litigation Plan, and should the parties stipulate to the dates proposed, only ONE Planneeds to be returned to the Court. This Scheduling Conference/Litigation form is to be filled out and filed with the Court no later than one week prior to hearing. CASE #: NATURE OF SUIT: CASE NAME: ASSIGNED JUDGE: PARTY BEING REPRESENTED: [ ] Plaintiff [ ] Defendant [ ] Parties have stipulated to the following dates ATTORNEY / LAW FIRM NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: I. TRIAL TRACK : Indicate the track that best fits your case. (Designation of a track is not binding but willassist the Court in assessing its workload and selecting a trial date and discovery schedule that meets counselsneeds.) [ ] Expedited Track (Typically, cases on this track will get a trial date in 6 to 9 months; take 4 days or less to try; involve limited discovery, and have no, or limited expert testimony.) [ ] Standard Track (Typically, cases on this track will get a trial date in 12 months; take about 5-10 days to try; and have about one or two experts per side.) [ ] Complex Track (Typically, cases on this track will get a trial date in 18-24 months; take 10 days or more to try; involve extensive discovery with staggered discovery schedules; and have extensive expert testimony.) [ ] Legal Track (Cases on this track involve legal issues which are likely to be resolved by motion rather than trial. A motion hearing will be set, but no trial date will be set until it is clear that the case cannot be resolved by motion.) <<<<<<<<<********>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2II. LITIGATION PLAN (Judge Williams prefers that parties anticipate time needed to complete discovery,set deadlines for discovery and dispositive motions and then work forward toward a trial date)1. JOINDER OF PARTIES & AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS CUT-OFF DATE: 2. NUMBER AND LENGTH OF DEPOSITIONS 3. FACTUAL DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE: 4. EXPERT TESTIMONY DISCLOSURES: (Local Rule 26.2 (b)) Plaintiff identify and disclose expert reports by: Defendant identify and disclose expert reports by: ALL discovery relevant to experts shall be completed by: 5. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS FILING CUT-OFF DATE 6. ESTIMATED LENGTH OF TRIAL: [ ] Jury [ ] Court The following dates will be entered by the Court at the Scheduling Conference 7. TRIAL DATE: 8. MOTIONS IN LIMINE CUT-OFF DATE 9. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: (Local Rule 16.2) II. ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION OPTIONS - All parties will be required to discuss these options1. MEDIATION (Local Rule 16.5) 2. ARBITRATION (Local Rule 16.5) 3. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (Local Rule 16.4)
|
|||||||
