Kansas > Local District Court > 3rd Judicial District (Shawnee County) > Adoption And Safe Families Act
Permanency Hearing Order For Child In Need Of Care - Kansas
| Permanency Hearing Order For Child In Need Of Care Form. This is a Kansas form and can be used in Adoption And Safe Families Act 3rd Judicial District (Shawnee County) Local District Court . |
|
||||||
 Get this form for FREE as a print-only pdf |
|||||||
|
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF COUNTY, KANSAS IN THE INTEREST OF: Name Case No.________________________ DOB / / A male female Name Case No.________________________ DOB / / A male female Name Case No.________________________ DOB / / A male female PERMANENCY HEARING ORDER FOR CHILD IN NEED OF CARE Pursuant to K.S.A. 38-1565 (Orders pertaining to more than one child must include findings specific to each child listed in the caption.) NOW on this day of , , the above-captioned matters come on for a permanency hearing [ to establish a permanency plan] [ for review of the plan for permanency, progress being made towards the goals of the plan and the viability of those goals]. THE COURT FINDS jurisdiction and venue are proper. All required notices have been given. All interested parties and any foster parents, pre-adoptive parents and relatives providing care have been properly notified. The petitioner appears by , [ Assistant] County/District Attorney or [ SRS] Attorney. The child(ren) appear [ in person and] [ not in person, but] by the child(ren)s guardian ad litem, . The mother appears [ not] [ in person Pro se] [ in person, and through her attorney, ____________ ] [ not in person, but by and through her attorney ___________________ ]. The [ putative] father appears [ not] [ in person Pro se] [ in person, and through his attorney, ] [ not in person, but by and through his attorney, ___________________________________________]. Other interested parties appearing are: . Others in attendance are: . SRS is present through: . CINC Perm Form (05/02) <<<<<<<<<********>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2PERMANENCY HEARING ORDER CINC Page 2 of 3 The Court, having reviewed the file, received the evidence, and heard statements of counsel, FINDS THAT: 1. a. The proposed permanency plan presented to the Court [ should] [ should not] be approved and adopted by the court as the plan for permanency in these matters. b. The progress to achieve the goals of the former permanency[ plan is] [ is not] a dequate. 2. a. Reasonable efforts [ have] [ have not] been made to accomplish the [ former] [ present] permanency goal of [ reintegration] [ adoption] kinship placement] [ other planned permanent living arrangement of (describe arrangement)] specifically (describe efforts): . b. Reasonable efforts to reunify the child(ren) and the family are not required due to the following circumstances when reintegration may not be a viable alternative as set out in K.S.A. 38-1563(h): . c. Reasonable efforts set out in the case plan necessary for a safe return of the child(ren) have not been made available to the parent with whom reintegration was planned, specifically: . 3. Continued out of home placement [ is] [ is not] necessary for the safety of: NAME: NAME: NAME: because (complete only if is necessary is checked) . 4. The child(ren)s needs [ are] [ are not] being adequately me t. 5. The child(ren) are in out of state placement, and such placem[ ent continues] [ does not continue] to be appropriate and in the best interests of the child(ren). 6. a. Reintegration is no longer a viable alternative for: (Check appropriate status from list below:) NAME: Status: 1 2 3 NAME: Status: 1 2 3 NAME: Status: 1 2 3 (1) The child(ren) are a stable placemin ent with a relative. (2) Either adoption or permanent guardianship might be in the best interests of the child(ren) and the [ county] [ district] attorney or attorneys designee shall file a pleading to terminate parental rights or a pleading to establish a permanent guardianship within 30 days. CINC Perm Form (05/02) <<<<<<<<<********>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3PERMANENCY HEARING ORDER CINC Page 3 of 3 3) Legal guardianship and adoption have been considered and the state has documented a compelling reason in support of another planned permanent living arrangement. or b. Reintegration continues to be a viable alternative for: (Check appropriate status from list below:) NAME: Status: 1 2 3 4 NAME: Status: 1 2 3 4 NAME: Status: 1 2 3 4 (1) The child(ren) should not be reintegrated until further order of the court. (2) The child(ren) may return hom[ e with a target date of day of , ,] [ if the following conditions are met): . (3) Services set out in the case plan necessary for a safe return of the child(ren) have not been maavailable to the parent with whomde reintegration was planned. (4) Within 30 days, a new plan for reintegration should be prepared and submitted to the Court with measurable goals, objectives and time frames 7. The previous orders of this Court [ shall continue in full force and effect] except as hereby modified] [ are hereby rescinded and the following orders are are hereby rescinded and the following orders are hereby issued pursuant to K.S.A. 38-1563]: . See Dispositional Order from this hearing. THE COURT FURTHER FINDS: THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter should be set for hearing on the day of , , at : A.M./P.M. BY ORDER OF THE COURT THIS day of , . _____________________________ Judge of the District Court CINC Perm Form (05/02)
|
|||||||
