Washington > Statewide > Domestic Relations > Parentage
Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law PS 04.0350 - Washington
| Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law Form. This is a Washington form and can be used in Parentage Domestic Relations Statewide . |
|
||||||
 Get this form for FREE as a print-only pdf |
|||||||
|
Superior Court of Washington County of In re Parentage: No. Petitioner, and Respondent, and Respondent, and Child(ren) over the age of 2. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Parentage) (FNFCL) I. Basis for Findings The findings are based on: [] [] [] agreement. an order of default or partial summary judgment signed by the court on this date or dated __________________________. trial. The following people attended: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Petitioner [ ] Petitioner's Attorney Respondent (name) _____________ [ ] Respondent's Attorney Respondent (name) _____________ [ ] Respondent's Attorney Respondent (name) _____________ [ ] Respondent's Attorney Child (name) _________________ [ ] Child's Guardian ad Litem Child (name) _________________ [ ] Child's Guardian ad Litem Guardian ad Litem of _________________________ Attorney for [ ] GAL ___________________ [ ] child ___________________ Other: II. Findings of Fact Findings/Conclusions of Law (FNFCL) - Page 1 of 7 WPF PS 04.0350 Mandatory (06/2012) - CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Upon the basis of the court record, the court finds: 2.1 Notice and Basis of Personal Jurisdiction Over the Respondents All necessary parties were served with a copy of the summons and petition and are subject to the jurisdiction of this court. The facts below establish personal jurisdiction over the parties listed: [] [] [] [] [] (Name) _________________________ was served within the state of Washington. (Name) _____________________________ was served within the state of Washington. All parties reside within the state of Washington. The child(ren) may have been conceived as a result of sexual intercourse that occurred within the state of Washington. Other: 2.2 Parentage Petitioner [] is the state of Washington. [] is (Name) ________________________ and: [ ] is not a parent of the child(ren). If this person was a presumed parent, the presumption has been rebutted by sufficient evidence. [ ] is a parent of the child(ren) (name(s))________________________________because this person is: [ ] a biological parent. [ ] an adoptive parent. [ ] is a presumed parent and the court confirms this presumption. [ ] parent by assisted reproduction. [ ] parent by surrogacy contract. Respondent (Name) _____________________: [] is not a parent of the child(ren). If this person was a presumed parent, the presumption has been rebutted by sufficient evidence. [] is a parent of the child(ren) (name(s))________________________________because this person is: [ ] a biological parent. [ ] an adoptive parent. [ ] is a presumed parent and the court confirms this presumption. [ ] parent by assisted reproduction. [ ] parent by surrogacy contract. Respondent (Name) _____________________: Findings/Conclusions of Law (FNFCL) - Page 2 of 7 WPF PS 04.0350 Mandatory (06/2012) - CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com [] [] is not a parent of the child(ren). If this person was a presumed parent, the presumption has been rebutted by sufficient evidence. is a parent of the child(ren) (name(s))________________________________because this person is: [ ] a biological parent. [ ] an adoptive parent. [ ] is a presumed parent and the court confirms this presumption. [ ] parent by assisted reproduction. [ ] parent by surrogacy contract. Genetic tests indicate a probability of parentage of _________________ percent for (name) ______________________________. The genetic test results may be expressed in probability of paternity. (Name) _____________________________ acknowledges parentage of the child(ren). Other: [] [] [] 2.3 Guardians ad Litem [] [] Does not apply. (Name) __________________________________ is the guardian ad litem for (name) ___________________________________ for the reason set out in the order appointing guardian ad litem dated __________________________________. (Name) __________________________________ is the guardian ad litem for (name) ___________________________________ for the reason set out in the order appointing guardian ad litem dated __________________________________. (Name) __________________________________ is the guardian ad litem for (name) ___________________________________ for the reason set out in the order appointing guardian ad litem dated __________________________________. (Name) __________________________________ is the guardian ad litem for (name) ___________________________________ for the reason set out in the order appointing guardian ad litem dated __________________________________. Other: [] [] [] [] 2.4 Costs and Fees [] [] Does not apply. There is no award of costs or fees because: [] (Name) __________________________ has the need for the payment of costs and fees and the other party has the ability to pay these costs and fees. Findings/Conclusions of Law (FNFCL) - Page 3 of 7 WPF PS 04.0350 Mandatory (06/2012) - CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com [] (Name) _________________________ has incurred reasonable attorney costs and fees in the amount of $__________. Other: 2.5 Continuing Restraining Order [] [] Does not apply. A continuing restraining order against (name) ______________________ [ ] both parties is necessary because: [] Other: 2.6 Protection Order [] [] Does not apply. The [ ] domestic violence [ ] antiharassment Order for Protection signed by the court on this date or dated ______________________, is approved and incorporated as part of these findings. 2.7 Basis of Jurisdiction Over the Child [] [] This court does not have jurisdiction over the child. This court has jurisdiction over the child for the reasons set forth below: [] This court has exclusive continuing jurisdiction. The court has previously made a child custody, parenting plan, residential schedule or visitation determination in this matter and retains jurisdiction under RCW 26.27.211. This state is the home state of the child because: [] the child lived in Washington with a parent or a person acting as a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately preceding the commencement of this proceeding. the child is less than six months old and has lived in Washington with a parent or a person acting as parent since birth. any absences from Washington have been only temporary. Washington was the home state of the child within six months before the commencement of this proceeding and the child is absent from the state but a parent or person ac
|
|||||||
