Washington > Statewide > Domestic Relations > Child Relocation Act
Order On Objection To Relocation Or Modification Of Custody Decree Or Parenting Plan Or Residential Schedule DRPSCU 07.0900 - Washington
| Order On Objection To Relocation Or Modification Of Custody Decree Or Parenting Plan Or Residential Schedule Form. This is a Washington form and can be used in Child Relocation Act Domestic Relations Statewide . |
|
||||||
 Get this form for FREE as a print-only pdf |
|||||||
|
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF In re: NO. Child(ren), ORDER ON OBJECTION TO RELOCATION/MODIFICATION OF CUSTODY DECREE/PARENTING Petitioner(s), PLAN/RESIDENTIAL SCHEDULE and (RELOCATION) (ORDYMT or ORGRRE) Respondent(s). I. BASIS This order is entered pursuant to: [ ] A hearing on the Objection to Relocation/Petition for Modification of Custody Decree/Parenting Plan/Residential Schedule held on ____________________________________________ [Date]. [ ] An agreement of the parties. [ ] An order of default entered on [Date]. II. FINDINGS The court FINDS: 2.1 ADEQUATE CAUSE. The relocation of children was pursued. There was no need for adequate cause for hearing this petition for modification. 2.2 JURISDICTION. This court has jurisdiction over this proceeding for the reasons below. ORD RE OBJ TO RELOC/MOD P PLAN/RES SCHD - Page 1 of 4 WPF DRPSCU 07.0900 (7/2003) - RCW 26.09.520, .260(6), 26.10.190, 26.26.160 <<<<<<<<<********>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 [ ] This court has exclusive continuing jurisdiction. The court has previously made a child custody, parenting plan, residential schedule or visitation determination in this matter and retains jurisdiction under RCW 26.27.211. [ ] This state is the home state of the children because: [ ] the children lived in Washington with a parent or a person acting as a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately preceding the commencement of this proceeding. [ ] the children are less than six months old and have lived in Washington with a parent or a person acting as parent since birth. [ ] any absences from Washington have been only temporary. [ ] Washington was the home state of the children within six months before the commencement of this proceeding and the children are absent from the state, but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this state. [ ] The children and the parents or the children and at least one parent or a person acting as a parent, have significant connection with the state other than mere physical presence; and substantial evidence is available in this state concerning the childrens care, protection, training and personal relationships and [ ] the children have no home state elsewhere. [ ] the childrens home state has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that this state is the more appropriate forum under RCW 26.27.261 or .271. [ ] All courts in the childrens home state have declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that a court of this state is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the children under RCW 26.27.261 or .271. [ ] No other state has jurisdiction. [ ] This court has temporary emergency jurisdiction over this proceeding because the children are present in this state and the children have been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the children because the children, or a sibling or parent of the children are subjected to or threatened with abuse. RCW 26.27.231. [ ] Other: ORD RE OBJ TO RELOC/MOD P PLAN/RES SCHD - Page 2 of 4 WPF DRPSCU 07.0900 (7/2003) - RCW 26.09.520, .260(6), 26.10.190, 26.26.160 <<<<<<<<<********>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32.3 FINDINGS REGARDING OBJECTION TO THE RELOCATION: Based upon the following factors, the detrimental effect of the relocation [ ] do [ ] do not outweigh the benefits of the change to the children and the relocating person: 2.4 FINDINGS REGARDING OBJECTION TO RELOCATING PARTYS PROPOSED PARENTING PLAN/RESIDENTIAL SCHEDULE. [ ] The petition for modification should be denied. The relocating partys proposed parenting plan should be approved. [ ] The petition for modification should be granted. The objecting partys request for an adjustment of the residential aspects of the relocating partys proposed parenting plan should be granted. The adjustment does not include a change in the residence in which the child resides the majority of the time. [ ] The petition for modification should be granted. The objecting partys request for a modification of the relocating partys proposed parenting plan/residential schedule, including a change in the residence in which the child resides the majority of the time, should be granted. III. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 3.1 OBJECTION TO RELOCATION. [ ] The relocating party is restrained from relocating the children. [ ] The relocating party is permitted to relocate the children. 3.2 PARENTING PLAN. [ ] The new parenting plan/residential schedule signed by the court and entered on _________________ [Date] is approved and incorporated as part of this order. This decree or parenting plan/residential schedule supersedes all previous decrees or parenting plans/residential schedules. ORD RE OBJ TO RELOC/MOD P PLAN/RES SCHD - Page 3 of 4 WPF DRPSCU 07.0900 (7/2003) - RCW 26.09.520, .260(6), 26.10.190, 26.26.160 <<<<<<<<<********>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4 [ ] The previously entered custody decree/parenting plan/residential schedule signed by the court and etenred on ____________________________________ [Date] shall remain in effect. 3.3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED. [ ] Child support shall be modified in accordance with the objecting partys parenting plan/residential schedule approved by the court. The order of child support signed by the court and entered on _____________________________ [Date] is approved and incorporated as part of this order. This order of child support supersedes all previous child support orders. [ ] The Order of Child Support signed by the court and entered on _________________ [Date] in ___________________________ County shall remain in effect. [ ] Other: Dated: JUDGE/COMMISSIONER Presented by: Approved by: Signature Signature Print or Type Name Print or Type Name ORD RE OBJ TO RELOC/MOD P PLAN/RES SCHD - Page 4 of 4 WPF DRPSCU 07.0900 (7/2003) - RCW 26.09.520, .260(6), 26.10.190, 26.26.160
|
|||||||
