Washington > Statewide > Domestic Relations > Nonparental Custody
Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law CU 02.0100 - Washington
| Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law Form. This is a Washington form and can be used in Nonparental Custody Domestic Relations Statewide . |
|
||||||
 Get this form for FREE as a print-only pdf |
|||||||
|
Superior Court of Washington County of In re the Custody of: No. Child(ren), Petitioner(s), and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Nonparental Custody) (FNFCL) Respondent(s). I. Basis for Findings The findings are based on: [] [] [] agreement. order(s) of default against (name(s))__________________________________________ signed by the court on this date or dated _________________________________________________. trial. The following parties and lawyers attended: ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ II. Findings of Fact Upon the basis of the court record, the court finds: Fndngs/Concls of Law (FNFCL) - Page 1 of 9 WPF CU 02.0100 Mandatory (07/2011) - CR 52; 26.10.040; .100 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com 2.1 Children for Whom Custody Is Sought The petitioner(s) are seeking custody of the following child(ren): 2.2 County Where Children Reside The child(ren) named in paragraph 2.1 permanently reside in this county or can be found in this county. 2.3 Indian Child Welfare Act Child's Indian status: The petitioner [ ] has [ ] has not made a good faith effort to determine whether the child(ren) are Indian Child(ren). [] Based upon the following, the child(ren) are not Indian child(ren) as defined in Laws of 2011, ch. 309, §4, and the federal and Washington State Indian Child Welfare Acts do not apply to these proceedings: [] Based upon the following, the child(en) are Indian child(ren) as defined in Laws of 2011, ch. 309, §4 and the federal and Washington State Indian Child Welfare Acts apply to these proceedings: [] The petitioner [ ] has [ ] has not provided notice of these proceedings as required by Laws of 2011, ch. 309, §7 and the Indian Child Welfare Act to all tribes to which the petitioner or court knows or has reason to know the child may be a member or eligible for membership. Jurisdiction: [] The child(ren) are Indian children as defined in Laws of 2011, ch. 309, §4 but are not domiciled or residing within the boundaries of an Indian reservation; and no Tribal Court has continuing jurisdiction over the child(ren); this court has jurisdiction under 25 USC § 1911. Fndngs/Concls of Law (FNFCL) - Page 2 of 9 WPF CU 02.0100 Mandatory (07/2011) - CR 52; 26.10.040; .100 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com [] The child(ren) are Indian children as defined in Laws of 2011, ch. 309, §4 and are domiciled or residing within the boundaries of an Indian reservation, and: [ ] the children's tribe has consented to Washington State's concurrent jurisdiction. [ ] the tribe has expressly declined to exercise its exclusive jurisdiction. 2.4 Basis of Jurisdiction [] This court has exclusive continuing jurisdiction. The court has previously made a child custody, parenting plan, residential schedule or visitation determination in this matter and: retains jurisdiction under RCW 26.27.211. This state is the home state of the children because: [] the children lived in Washington with a parent or a person acting as a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately preceding the commencement of this proceeding. the children are less than six months old and have lived in Washington with a parent or a person acting as parent since birth. any absences from Washington have been only temporary. Washington was the home state of the children within six months before the commencement of this proceeding and the children are absent from the state but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this state. [] [] [] [] [] The children and the parents or the children and at least one parent or a person acting as a parent have significant connection with the state other than mere physical presence, and substantial evidence is available in this state concerning the children's care, protection, training and personal relationships, and: [] [] The children have no home state elsewhere. The children's home state has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that this state is the more appropriate forum under RCW 26.27.261 or .271. [] All courts in the children's home state have declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that a court of this state is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the children under RCW 26.27.261 or .271. No other state has jurisdiction. This court has temporary emergency jurisdiction over this proceeding because the children are present in this state and the children have been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the children because the children, or a sibling or parent of the children is subjected to or threatened with abuse. RCW 26.27.231. [] There is a previous custody determination that is entitled to be enforced under this chapter or a child custody proceeding has been commenced in a court of a state having jurisdiction under RCW 26.27.201 through 26.27.221. The requirements of RCW 26.27.231(3) apply to this matter. This state's jurisdiction over the children shall last until (date) _______________________________. [] [] Fndngs/Concls of Law (FNFCL) - Page 3 of 9 WPF CU 02.0100 Mandatory (07/2011) - CR 52; 26.10.040; .100 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com [] There is no previous custody determination that is entitled to be enforced under this chapter and a child custody proceeding has not been commenced in a court of a state having jurisdiction under RCW 26.27.201 through 26.27.221. If an action is not filed in (potential home state) _____________________ by the time the child has been in Washington for six months, (date) ___________________, then Washington's jurisdiction will be final and continuing. [] Other: 2.5 Background Records Check The court has consulted the judicial information system, if available, to determine the existence of any information and proceedings that are relevant to the placement of the child. The court has also directed the Department of Social and Health Services to release information as provided under RCW 13.50.100; and has required the petitioner to provide the results of an examination of state criminal identification data provided by the Washington State Patrol criminal identification system as described in chapter 43.43 RCW for the petitioner and adult members of the petitioner's hous
|
|||||||
