Maryland > Statewide > Circuit Court > Family Law > Judgments And Orders
Adjudication And Disposition Hearings Order JO-22 - Maryland
| Adjudication And Disposition Hearings Order Form. This is a Maryland form and can be used in Judgments And Orders Family Law Circuit Court Statewide . |
|
||||||
|
IN THE STATE OF MARYLAND ____________________________________, MARYLAND CITY or COUNTY In the Matter of: ________________________________ RESPONDENT'S FULL NAME ________________________________________________ RESPONDENT'S DOB Sitting as a Juvenile Court ) ) ) ) ) Case Number: ______________________ ) ) ) ADJUDICATION/ DISPOSITION ORDER Upon consideration of the CINA Petition and written stipulation proffer evidence submitted by the __________________________________________________, and with the following persons present: [PARTIES] Child Child's Attorney Case/Social Worker DSS Attorney Mother Advised of right to counsel Self Represented Father Advised of right to counsel Self Represented Guardian Advised of right to counsel Self Represented Custodian CASA Other_________________ Mother's Attorney Father's Attorney Guardian's Attorney Other________________ The ______________ attorney amended the Petition in the following manner: ___________________________ [ DSS or COUNTY] and having heard this matter on the issue________________, by the Court for ____________________, on this [CITY or COUNTY] ____ day of ____________, 20_____, [MONTH] THE COURT FINDS BY PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE: (if not previously found at shelter)-At the time of removal, the child/respondent was in the physical custody of ___________________________________________________, with whom the child began [ INDIVIDUAL NAME, RELATIONSHIP TO THE CHILD] living on _____________ and [DATE] in the legal custody of __________________________________, with whom the child last lived on ________. [INDIVIDUAL NAME, RELATIONSHIP TO THE CHILD] [DATE] Or Information not available because ________________________________ [e.g. abandonment, runaway, etc.] In accordance with Rule 11-114 and the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland §3-817, that the allegations in the CINA petition have been proven by a preponderance of the evidence, and that the following facts as alleged in the petition CC-JO22 (Revised 12/2009) 1 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com were sustained: ___________________________________________________________________. were not sustained: ________________________________________________________________. The following additional facts were found: ______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ That the evidence presented sustained the finding that continuation of the aforesaid child in the child's home is not contrary to the child's welfare and that it is now possible to return the child to that home because the following circumstances exist: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________; and there is no further likelihood of abuse or neglect is contrary to the child's welfare and that it is not possible to return the child to that home because the following circumstances exist: ______________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ It is further found that the evidence presented sustained that reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child: were made because of the following ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________; or were not made because the following emergent circumstances existed _____________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________; or were not made. The efforts or absence of reasonable efforts were not reasonable for the following reasons _____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________; or The court has found by clear and convincing evidence that the local department is not required to provide reunification services because this case involves a case of chronic abuse; chronic and life threatening neglect; sexual abuse; torture; crimes of violence; or a prior involuntary termination of parental rights in accordance with Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland §3-812. ________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ The CINA petition is DISMISSED before DISPOSITION CC-JO22 (Revised 12/2009) 2 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com DISPOSITION DISPOSITION #1 In light of the above findings on this _____ of ________ 20___, it is therefore [MONTH] ORDERED, in accordance with the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland, Section 3-819 and the Maryland Rules of Procedure, Rule 11-115, that the child is found to be a Child in Need of Assistance for the following reasons ______________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________: [Describe reasons found as a result of the sustained facts and other dispositional information] and, it is further ORDERED, that the Respondent Child, __________________________________, be placed/ continued [NAME OF THE RESPONDENT CHILD] in the custody of __________________________________________: and/or [NAME OF PARENT(S)/ RELATIVE/ OTHER] under the protective supervision of the ______________ or [LOCAL DSS] committed to the custody of the __________ pending further dispositional review before this Court; [LOCAL DSS] and it is further, _____________________________ [continue with other orders] Or Formatted DISPOSITION #2 In light of the above findings on this _____ of ________ 20___, it is therefore [MONTH] ORDERED, in accordance with the Courts and
|
|||||||


