Washington > Statewide > Domestic Relations > Child Relocation Act
Objection To Relocation Petition For Modification Of Cusody Decree Parenting Plan Residential Schedule DRPSCU 07.0700 - Washington
| Objection To Relocation Petition For Modification Of Cusody Decree Parenting Plan Residential Schedule Form. This is a Washington form and can be used in Child Relocation Act Domestic Relations Statewide . |
|
||||||
 Get this form for FREE as a print-only pdf |
|||||||
|
Superior Court of Washington County of In re: No. Child(ren), Petitioner(s), and Objection to Relocation/ Petition for Modification of Custody Decree/Parenting Plan/Residential Schedule (OBPT) Para. 3.10: check box if petition is attached for: [ ] Order for protection DV (PTORPRT) [ ] Order for protection UH (PTORAH) Respondent(s). I. 1.1 Objecting Party Identification of Parties Name (first/last) of objecting party ______________________________________________. 1.2 Relocating Party Name (first/last) of relocating party ______________________________________________. 1.3 Other Persons With Court-Ordered Time With the Children List other persons with court-ordered time with the children. Name (first/last) _____________________________________________________________ Name (first/last) _____________________________________________________________ Name (first/last) _____________________________________________________________ 1.4 Dependent Children Name (first/last) _____________________________________________ Age _________ Name (first/last) _____________________________________________ Age _________ Name (first/last) _____________________________________________ Age _________ Obj/Relocation/Pt for Modification (OBPT) - Page 1 of 9 WPF DRPSCU 07.0700 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW 26.09.260(6), .480 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com Name (first/last) _____________________________________________ Age _________ Name (first/last) _____________________________________________ Age _________ II. Objection to Relocation or Proposed Revised Residential Schedule (Check all that apply) 2.1 [] I, (objecting party) ___________________________________, object to the intended relocation described in (relocating party) _______________________________'s Notice of Intended Relocation of Children dated _________________________________. I, (objecting party) _________________________________________, object to the proposed revised parenting plan/residential schedule attached to (relocating party) ______________________________________'s Notice of Intended Relocation of Children dated ________________________. 2.2 [] A true and correct copy of the Notice of Intended Relocation of Children, [ ] without [ ] with proposed new parenting plan/residential schedule, is attached. III. Basis 3.1 Petition for an Order Modifying Custody Decree/Parenting Plan/Residential Schedule Pursuant to Relocation This is a petition for modification of custody decree/parenting plan/residential schedule pursuant to relocation. The objecting party asks the court to enter an order: [] [] [] [] Restraining the intended relocation of the children. Retaining the custody decree/parenting plan/residential schedule entered on (date) _____________________________ . Approving the parenting plan/residential schedule filed with this petition. (Use the Washington State mandatory pattern form.) Other: 3.2 Adequate Cause The relocation of the children is being pursued. There is no need for adequate cause for hearing this petition for modification. 3.3 Child Support [] [] Does not apply. An order establishing child support in conjunction with the proposed parenting plan should be entered. A child support worksheet and financial declaration have been filed with this action. (No separate petition for modification of child support needs to be filed.) 3.4 Jurisdiction and Venue Obj/Relocation/Pt for Modification (OBPT) - Page 2 of 9 WPF DRPSCU 07.0700 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW 26.09.260(6), .480 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com The court has proper jurisdiction and venue. The objecting party resides in (county and state only) ____________________________________. The children reside in (county and state only) __________________________________________. The relocating party resides in (county and state only) ___________________________________. The current custody decree/parenting plan/residential schedule was entered in (county and state) _____________________________________________. A certified copy of the current custody decree/parenting plan/residential schedule is filed with or attached to this petition, if the decree or plan to be modified was entered in another county or state. 3.5 Jurisdiction Over Proceeding This court has jurisdiction over this proceeding for the reasons below. [] This court has exclusive continuing jurisdiction. The court has previously made a child custody, parenting plan, residential schedule or visitation determination in this matter and retains jurisdiction under RCW 26.27.211. This state is the home state of the children because: [] the children lived in Washington with a parent or a person acting as a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately preceding the commencement of this proceeding. the children are less than six months old and have lived in Washington with a parent or a person acting as parent since birth. any absences from Washington have been only temporary. Washington was the home state of the children within six months before the commencement of this proceeding and the children are absent from the state, but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this state. [] [] [] [] [] The children and the parents or the children and at least one parent or a person acting as a parent have significant connection with the state other than mere physical presence, and substantial evidence is available in this state concerning the children's care, protection, training and personal relationships, and [] [] the children have no home state elsewhere. the children's home state has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that this state is the more appropriate forum under RCW 26.27.261 or.271. [] All courts in the children's home state have declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that a court of this state is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the children under RCW 26.27.261 or .271. No other state has jurisdiction. This court has temporary emergency jurisdiction over this proceeding because the children are present in this state and the children have been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the children because the children, or a sibling or parent of the children is subjected to or threatened with abuse. RCW 26.27.231. [] [] Obj/Relocation/Pt for Modification (OBPT) - Page 3 of 9 WPF DRPSCU 07.0700 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW 26.09.260(6), .480 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com [] There is a previous cu
|
|||||||
