California > Judicial Council > Juvenile
Findings And Orders After Six-Month Prepermanency Hearing-Delinquency JV-672 - California
| Findings And Orders After Six-Month Prepermanency Hearing-Delinquency Form. This is a California form and can be used in Juvenile Judicial Council . |
|
||||||
 Get this form for FREE as a print-only pdf |
|||||||
|
JV-672 CHILD'S NAME: CASE NUMBER: FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER SIX-MONTH PREPERMANENCY HEARING--DELINQUENCY 1. The court has read and considered and admits into evidence: a. Report of probation dated: b. Other (specify): BASED ON THE FOREGOING AND ON ALL OTHER EVIDENCE RECEIVED, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS 2. a. b. Notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing was given as required by law. For child who is not present: The child received proper notice of his or her right to attend the hearing and voluntarily gave up that right to attend this hearing. The child is may be an Indian child, and notice of the proceeding and the right of the tribe to intervene was provided as required by law. Proof of such notice was filed with this court. There is reason to believe that the child may be of Indian ancestry, and notice of the proceedings was provided to the Bureau of Indian Affairs as required by law. Proof of such notice was filed with this court. 3. a. b. Child returned home The return of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would not create a substantial risk of detriment to the safety, 4. protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child. Out-of-home placement is no longer necessary or appropriate. The agency has complied with the case plan by making reasonable efforts to return the child safely home and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child. Child remaining in out-of-home placement 5. By a preponderance of the evidence, the return of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child. The factual basis for this conclusion is stated on the record. The child's out-of-home placement is necessary. The child's out-of-home placement is appropriate. The child's current placement is not appropriate. This hearing is continued for a report by the agency on the progress made to locate an appropriate placement. The child has run away from placement. Out-of-home placement continues to be necessary. The placement was appropriate. Probation has made reasonable efforts to locate the child. Probation has complied with the case plan by making reasonable efforts to return the child to a safe home and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent plan. The child is placed outside the state of California and that out-of-state placement: a. continues to be the most appropriate placement and is in the child's best interest. There are no available and adequate in-state facilities to meet the child's needs. All licensure requirements have been met or a waiver granted. The placement complies with the requirements of Family Code section 7911.1. does not continue to be the most appropriate placement for the child and is not in the best interest of the child. The matter is continued for a report by the county agency on the progress made toward finding an appropriate placement for the child. 6. 7. a. b. 8. 9. b. 10. has has not complied with the case plan by making reasonable efforts to return the Probation child to a safe home through the provision of reasonable services designed to aid in overcoming the problems that led to the initial removal and continued custody of the child, and by making reasonable efforts to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent plan. The child is an Indian child, and by clear and convincing evidence active efforts were were not made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of this Indian family. The child has no known Indian heritage. 11. 12. Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California JV-672 [New January 1, 2012] FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER SIX-MONTH PREPERMANENCY HEARING (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2) Welfare and Institutions Code, § 727.2; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.810(a) www.courts.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com JV-672 CHILD'S NAME: CASE NUMBER: 12. The following persons have made the indicated level of progress toward alleviating or mitigating the causes necessitating placement: None Minimal Adequate Substantial Excellent Child a. Mother b. Father c. Legal guardian d. Other (specify): e. f. Other (specify): The likely date by which the child may be returned to and safely maintained in the home or placed for adoption, appointed a legal guardian, placed permanently with a relative, or placed in an identified placement with a specific goal is (date): The child is 16 years or older. The services set forth in the case plan include those needed to assist the child in making the transition from foster care to independence and adulthood. The following were actively involved in the case plan development, including the plan for permanent placement: child mother father legal guardian tribal representative other: The following were NOT actively involved in the case plan development, including the plan for permanent placement. The probation officer is ordered to actively involve them and submit an updated case plan within 30 days from today. child mother father legal guardian tribal representative other: The following were NOT actively involved in the case plan development, including the plan for permanent placement. The probation officer is not required to involve them because they are unable, unavailable, or unwilling to participate. child mother father legal guardian tribal representative other: The court finds that the child's: a. developmental needs b. mental health needs are are are not being met are not being met c. physical needs d. education needs are are are not are not being met being met 13. Case planning and visitation 14. 15. a. b. c. 16. 17. The additional services, assessments, and/or evaluations the child requires and the person(s) or agency ordered to take the steps necessary for the child to receive these services, assessments, and/or evaluations are: a. b. set forth on the record. as follows: The following are ordered by the court to participate with the child in a counseling or education program as directed by probation: Mother Father Legal guardian Other (specify): The participation by the following is deemed by the court to be inappropriate or potentially detrimental to the child and their participation with the child in a counseling or education program is NOT ordered: Mother Father Legal guardian Other (specify): 18. a. b. 19. T
|
|||||||
