California > Judicial Council > Juvenile
Findings And Orders After Permanency Hearing-Delinquency JV-674 - California
| Findings And Orders After Permanency Hearing-Delinquency Form. This is a California form and can be used in Juvenile Judicial Council . |
|
||||||
 Get this form for FREE as a print-only pdf |
|||||||
|
JV-674 CHILD'S NAME: CASE NUMBER: FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER PERMANENCY HEARING--DELINQUENCY 12 MONTH 18 MONTH (only if reunification services extended at 12 months) 1. The court has read and considered and admits into evidence: a. Report of probation dated: b. Other (specify): BASED ON THE FOREGOING AND ON ALL OTHER EVIDENCE RECEIVED, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS 2. a. b. Notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing was given as required by law. For child who is not present: The child received proper notice of his or her right to attend the hearing and voluntarily gave up that right to attend this hearing. The child is may be an Indian child, and notice of the proceeding and the right of the tribe to intervene was provided as required by law. Proof of such notice was filed with this court. There is reason to believe that the child may be of Indian ancestry, and notice of the proceedings was provided to the Bureau of Indian Affairs as required by law. Proof of such notice was filed with this court. 3. a. b. Child returned home The return of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would not create a substantial risk of detriment to the safety, 4. protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child. Out-of-home placement is no longer necessary or appropriate. The agency has complied with the case plan by making reasonable efforts to return the child safely home and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child. Child remaining in out-of-home placement: 5. By a preponderance of the evidence, the return of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child. The factual basis for this conclusion is stated on the record. The child's out-of-home placement is necessary. a. b. 8. The child's out-of-home placement is appropriate. The child's current placement is not appropriate. This hearing is continued for a report by the agency on the progress made to locate an appropriate placement. The child has run away from placement. Out-of-home placement continues to be necessary. The placement was appropriate. Probation has made reasonable efforts to locate the child. Probation has complied with the case plan by making reasonable efforts to return the child to a safe home and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent plan. The child is placed outside the state of California and that out-of-state placement: a. continues to be the most appropriate placement and is in the child's best interest. There are no available and adequate in-state facilities to meet the child's needs. All licensure requirements have been met or a waiver granted. The placement complies with the requirements of Family Code section 7911.1. does not continue to be the most appropriate placement for the child and is not in the best interest of the child. The matter is continued for a report by the county agency on the progress made toward finding an appropriate placement for the child. 6. 7. 9. b. 10. has has not complied with the case plan by making reasonable efforts to return the The agency child to a safe home through the provision of reasonable services designed to aid in overcoming the problems that led to the initial removal and continued custody of the child, and by making reasonable efforts to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent plan. The child is an Indian child, and, by clear and convincing evidence, active efforts were were not made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of this Indian family. The child has no known Indian heritage. Page 1 of 4 Welfare and Institutions Code, § 727.3; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.810(b) www.courts.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com 11. 12. Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California JV-674 [New January 1. 2012] FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER PERMANENCY HEARING (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.3) JV-674 CHILD'S NAME: CASE NUMBER: 13. The following persons have made the indicated level of progress toward alleviating or mitigating the causes necessitating placement: None Minimal Adequate Substantial Excellent a. Child b. Mother Father c. Legal guardian d. e. Other (specify): f. Other (specify): Reunification services are continued terminated. 14. 15. The following is appropriate and ordered as the permanent plan (choose only one plan): a. b. Return the child home immediately. Return the child to the physical custody of the mother father legal guardian after an additional 6 months of reunification services. The minor and the parent or guardian have demonstrated the capacity and ability to complete the objectives of the case plan. There is a substantial probability that the child will be returned to and safely maintained in the home within 18 months of the initial removal date. The court advises all parents that if the child is not returned to the custody of a parent within the next six months, a hearing under Welfare & Institution Code section 727.31 may be held which could result in the termination of their parental rights and the child's adoption. The case is continued for a subsequent permanency planning hearing. Adoption. The court finds by clear and convincing evidence that reasonable services have been provided or offered to the parents. A hearing is set under the procedures described in Welfare and Institutions Code section 727.31 and an adoption assessment report ordered. The likely date by which the child will be placed for adoption is (specify): d. Legal guardianship. A hearing is set under Welfare and Institutions Code section 728(c). The likely date by which the child will be placed for guardianship is (specify): e. Placement on a permanent basis with (name): The likely date by which the child will be placed for adoption or guardianship is (specify): The relative is authorized to provide consent for the child's medical, surgical, and dental care as provided in Order Granting Authority to Consent to Medical, Surgical, and Dental Care (form JV-448). f. By clear and convincing evidence, there is a compelling reason for determining that a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 727.31 is not in the best interest of the child based on evidence that (specify all that apply): Adoption is not in the child's best interest and not an appropriate permanency goal. No
|
|||||||
