California > Judicial Council > Juvenile
Attachment Additional Findings And Orders For Minor Approaching Majority-Delinquency JV-680 - California
| Attachment Additional Findings And Orders For Minor Approaching Majority-Delinquency Form. This is a California form and can be used in Juvenile Judicial Council . |
|
||||||
 Get this form for FREE as a print-only pdf |
|||||||
|
JV-680 MINOR'S NAME: CASE NUMBER: ATTACHMENT: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND ORDERS FOR MINOR APPROACHING MAJORITY--DELINQUENCY Use this form to document the juvenile court's findings and orders regarding the possible modification of jurisdiction over the minor from delinquency jurisdiction to transition jurisdiction or dependency jurisdiction, the minor's plans for independent living, and his or her status as a nonminor dependent as set forth in Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.812, at the following hearings: 1. A review hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2 held on behalf of a minor approaching majority. 2. A review hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2 during which a recommendation to terminate juvenile court jurisdiction is considered, held on behalf of a minor more than 17 years, 5 months and less than 18 years of age; or 3. Any other hearing, during which a recommendation to terminate juvenile court jurisdiction is considered, held on behalf of a minor more than 17 years, 5 months and less than 18 years of age who is in a foster care placement or who was subject to an order for a foster care placement as a dependent when he or she was adjudged to be a ward. BASED ON THE REPORTS READ, CONSIDERED, AND ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE AND ALL OTHER EVIDENCE RECEIVED, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS: Findings: 1. a. b. The minor's rehabilitative goals have been met. Juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a ward is no longer required. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record. The minor's rehabilitative goals have not been met. Continued juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a ward is required. The facts supporting this finding are stated on the record. For a dual status minor for whom dependency jurisdiction was suspended under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 241.1(e)(5)(A): a. b. A return to the minor's home would be detrimental to the minor and juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a dependent should be resumed. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record. A return to the minor's home would not be detrimental to the minor and juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a dependent does not need to be resumed. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record. 2. 3. For a dual status minor for whom the probation department was designated the lead agency under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 241.1(e)(5)(B): a. A return to the minor's home would be detrimental to the minor, and juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a dual status child is no longer required. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record. A return to the minor's home would not be detrimental to the minor, and juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a dependent is not required. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record. b. 4. For other than a dual status minor: a. The minor was not a court dependent at the time he or she was declared a ward. The minor does and cannot record. b. can does not appear to come within the description of Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 be returned home safely. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the The minor was subject to an order for a foster care placement as a dependent of the court at the time he or she was adjudged a ward and does does not remain within the description of a dependent child under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 and a return to the home of his or her parents or legal guardian would would not create a substantial risk of detriment to the minor's safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being. The facts supporting the findings were stated on the record. c. d. e. Reunification services The minor's case a guardianship. has have have not has not been terminated. been set for a hearing to terminate parental rights or establish The minor does does not setting as a nonminor dependent. intend to sign a mutual agreement for a placement in a supervised Page 1 of 4 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California JV-680 [Rev. July 1, 2012] ATTACHMENT: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND ORDERS FOR MINOR APPROACHING MAJORITY--DELINQUENCY Welfare and Institutions Code, §§ 450, 451, 607.2, 727.2(i)(j), 778; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.812 www.courts.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com JV-680 MINOR'S NAME: CASE NUMBER: 5. The minor's Transitional Independent Living Case Plan includes a plan for the minor to satisfy the following conditions of eligibility to remain under juvenile court jurisdiction as a nonminor dependent: a. b. c. d. e. The minor plans to continue attending high school or a high school equivalency certificate (GED) program. The minor plans to attend a college, a community college, or a vocational education program. The minor plans to take part in a program or activities to promote employment or overcome barriers to employment. The minor plans to be employed at least 80 hours a month. The minor may not be able to attend school, college, a vocational program, a program or activities to promote employment or overcome barriers to employment, or to work 80 hours per month due to a medical condition. 6. The minor's Transitional Independent Living Case Plan includes an alternative plan for the minor's transition to independence, including housing, education, employment, and a support system in the event the minor does not remain under juvenile court jurisdiction after attaining 18 years of age. For an Indian child, he or she does does not intend to continue to be considered an Indian child for the purposes of the ongoing application of the Indian Child Welfare Act to him or her as a nonminor dependent. The minor has an in-progress application pending for title XVI Supplemental Security Income benefits, and the continuation of juvenile court jurisdiction until a final decision has been issued to ensure continued assistance with the application process a. b. is in the child's best interest. is not in the child's best interest as it is not necessary. 7. 8. 9. The minor has an in-progress application pending for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status or other application for legal residency for which an active juvenile court case is required. The potential benefits of remaining under juvenile court jurisdiction as a nonminor dependent were explained to the minor and the minor has stated that he or she understands those benefits. The minor was informed that he or she may decline to become a nonminor dependent. The minor was informed that on reaching 18 years of age, he or she
|
|||||||
