California > Judicial Council > Juvenile
Eighteen-Month Prepermanency Attachment Child Reunified JV-443 - California
| Eighteen-Month Prepermanency Attachment Child Reunified Form. This is a California form and can be used in Juvenile Judicial Council . |
|
||||||
 Get this form for FREE as a print-only pdf |
|||||||
|
JV-443 CHILD'S NAME: CASE NUMBER: EIGHTEEN-MONTH PERMANENCY ATTACHMENT: REUNIFICATION SERVICES CONTINUED (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22) 1. By a preponderance of the evidence, the return of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child. The factual basis for this conclusion is stated on the record. Placement 2. The child's out-of-home placement is necessary. 3. 4. The child's current placement is appropriate. The child's current placement is not appropriate. The county agency must locate an appropriate placement for the child. a. The matter is continued to the date and time indicated on form JV-440, item 25 for a written oral report by the county agency on the progress made in locating an appropriate placement. b. Other (specify): The child is placed outside the state of California and that out-of-state placement a. b. continues to be the most appropriate placement for the child and is in the best interest of the child. does not continue to be the most appropriate placement for the child and is not in the best interest of the child. The matter is continued to the date and time indicated in form JV-440, item 25 for a written oral report by the county agency on the progress made toward (1) (2) (3) returning the child to California and locating an appropriate placement within California. locating an out-of-state placement that is the most appropriate placement for the child and in the best interest of the child. Other (specify): 5. Reunification services 6. By clear and convincing evidence, it is in the best interest of the child to provide additional reunification services to the a. (1) (2) and b. There is a substantial probability that the child may be returned to the Indian custodian mother biological father presumed father legal guardian other (specify): by the date set for the 24-month permanency hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22 because the person has (1) consistently and regularly contacted and visited the child; (2) (3) made significant and consistent progress in the prior 18 months in resolving the problems that led to the child's removal from the home; and demonstrated the capacity and ability to provide for the safety, protection, physical and emotional health, and special needs of the child and (a) to complete the objectives of his or her substance abuse treatment plan as evidenced by reports from a substance abuse provider. (b) to complete a treatment plan postdischarge from incarceration or institutionalization. Page 1 of 2 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California JV-443 [New July 1, 2011] mother presumed father biological father legal guardian Indian custodian other (specify): who is making significant and consistent progress in a substance abuse treatment program. who is recently discharged from incarceration or institutionalization and making significant and consistent progress in establishing a safe home for the child's return. EIGHTEEN-MONTH PERMANENCY ATTACHMENT: REUNIFICATION SERVICES CONTINUED (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22) Welfare and Institutions Code, § 366.22 Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.708 and 5.720 www.courts.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com JV-443 CHILD'S NAME: CASE NUMBER: 7. Reunification services are continued for the biological father mother a. b. presumed father legal guardian as previously ordered. as modified (1) on the record. (2) in the case plan. Indian custodian other (specify): 8. The likely date by which the child may be placed for adoption, tribal customary adoption, legal guardianship, or in an identified placement with a specific goal is (specify date): Important individuals 9. Child 10 years of age or older, placed in a group home for six months or longer from the date the child entered foster care a. The county agency has made efforts to identify individuals who are important to the child and to maintain the child's relationships with those individuals, consistent with the child's best interest. The county agency has not made efforts to identify individuals who are important to the child and to maintain the b. child's relationships with those individuals, consistent with the child's best interest. To identify individuals who are important to the child and to maintain the child's relationships with those c. individuals, the county agency must provide the services (1) as stated on the record. (2) as follows: Health 10. The mother presumed father biological father legal guardian Indian custodian other (specify): is unable unwilling unavailable to make decisions regarding the child's needs for medical, surgical, dental, or other remedial care, and the right to make these decisions is suspended under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 369 and vested with the county agency. Advisement 11. The court informed all parties present at the time of the hearing and further advises all parties that if the child is not returned to the home at the 24-month permanency hearing set on a date within 24 months from the date the child was initially removed from his or her home, the case may be referred to a selection and implementation hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26 that may result in the termination of parental rights and adoption of the child and other members of the sibling group or, in the case of an Indian child for whom tribal customary adoption under section 366.24 is selected as the permanent plan goal, modification of parental rights and the adoption of the child and other members of the sibling group. Twenty-four-month permanency hearing date: JV-443 [New July 1, 2011] EIGHTEEN-MONTH PERMANENCY ATTACHMENT: REUNIFICATION SERVICES CONTINUED (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22) Page 2 of 2
|
|||||||
