Final Order About Moving With Children Relocation {735}

Superior Court of Washington, County of In re: Petitioner/s (as listed on the parenting/custody order): No. Final Order and Findings on Objection about Moving with Children and Petition about Changing a Parenting/Custody Order (Relocation) (ORDYMT or ORGRRE) Clerks' action required: 1, 12 And Respondent/s (as listed on the parenting/ custody order): Final Order and Findings on Objection about Moving with Children and Petition about Changing a Parenting/Custody Order (Relocation) 1. Money Judgment Summary No money judgment is ordered. Summarize any money judgment from section 12 in the table below. Judgment for Debtor's name (person who must pay money) Creditor's name (person who must be paid) Amount Interest Guardian ad litem (GAL) fees Lawyer fees Court costs Other fees and expenses (specify): Yearly Interest Rate: ____% (12% unless otherwise listed) Lawyer (name): Lawyer (name): represents (name): represents (name): $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ RCW 26.09.520, .260(6), 26.10.190, 26.26.160 - Mandatory Form (05/2016) FL Relocate 735 Final Order and Findings on Objection about Moving with Children and Petition... p. 1 of 8 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com 2. This Order is based on the (check all that apply): agreement of everyone with a legal right to spend time with the children in this case. Order on Motion for Default signed on (date): court's decision about the Objection after a contested trial on (date): The following people were at the trial (check all that apply): Petitioner (name): Respondent (name): Guardian ad Litem (name): Other (name and relationship to this case): Other (name and relationship to this case): This person's lawyer This person's lawyer . . Findings & Conclusions 3. Jurisdiction over the children (RCW 26.27.201 ­ .221, .231, .261, .271) The court cannot decide this case for the children because the court does not have jurisdiction over the children. The court can decide this case for the children because (check all that apply; if a box applies to all of the children, you may write "the children" instead of listing names): Exclusive, continuing jurisdiction ­ A Washington court has already made a parenting plan, residential schedule or custody order for the children, and the court still has authority to make other orders for (children's names): . Home state jurisdiction ­ Washington is the children's home state because (check all that apply): (Children's names): lived in Washington with a parent or someone acting as a parent for at least the 6 months just before this case was filed, or if the children were less than 6 months old when the case was filed, they had lived in Washington with a parent or someone acting as a parent since birth. There were times the children were not in Washington in the 6 months just before this case was filed (or since birth if they were less than 6 months old), but those were temporary absences. (Children's names): do not live in Washington right now, but Washington was the children's home state at some time in the 6 months just before this case was filed, and a parent or someone acting as a parent of the children still lives in Washington. (Children's names): home state. do not have another No home state or home state declined ­ No court of any other state (or tribe) has the jurisdiction to make decisions for (children's names): or a court in the children's home state (or tribe) decided it is better to have this case in Washington and: The children and a parent or someone acting as a parent have ties to Washington beyond just living here; and RCW 26.09.520, .260(6), 26.10.190, 26.26.160 - Mandatory Form (05/2016) FL Relocate 735 Final Order and Findings on Objection about Moving with Children and Petition... p. 2 of 8 , American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com  There is a lot of information (substantial evidence) about the children's care, protection, education and relationships in this state. Other state declined ­ The courts in other states (or tribes) that might be (children's names): 's home state have refused to take this case because it is better to have this case in Washington. Temporary emergency jurisdiction ­ Washington had temporary emergency jurisdiction over (children's names): when the case was filed, and now has jurisdiction to make a final custody decision because: When the case was filed, the children were abandoned in this state, or the children were in this state and the children (or children's parent, brother or sister) was abused or threatened with abuse; The court signed a temporary order on (date) _______________ saying that Washington's jurisdiction will become final if no case is filed in the children's home state (or tribe) by the time the children have been in Washington for 6 months; The children have now lived in Washington for 6 months; and No case concerning the children has been started in the children's home state (or tribe). Other reason (specify): 4. Factors for / against move with children Does not apply. There was no objection to the children moving. (Skip to 5.) Based on the factors listed below, the Court concludes that the planned move (check one): would would not cause more harm to the children than good to the children and the parent (or non-parent custodian) who wants to move. a. Relationships: The children's relationships with each parent, any siblings, and other important people in the children's life. (Findings about the strength, nature, quality, extent of involvement, and stability of the children's relationships and how those would be affected by the planned move): b. Agreements: Findings: There were were not agreements between the parents/custodian about moving with the children. RCW 26.09.520, .260(6), 26.10.190, 26.26.160 - Mandatory Form (05/2016) FL Relocate 735 Final Order and Findings on Objection about Moving with Children and Petition... p. 3 of 8 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com c. Contact: Findings: Disrupting the children's contact with the moving parent (or would would not be more harmful to them than non-parent custodian) disrupting their contact with the non-moving parent. d. Limitations: Findings: The current parenting/custody order includes not include limitations under RCW 26.09.191 on a parent (or non-parent custodian). does e. Reasons for moving: Findings: The reasons for moving given in good faith. were were not f. Reasons for objecting: Findings: The reasons for objecting to the move were were not given in good faith. g. Children: Find